Center for Strategic Assessment and forecasts

Autonomous non-profit organization

Home / Economy and Finance / The financial system of a new era / Articles
"Brave new world": what promise trillions in the accounts of the Central banks
Material posted: Publication date: 29-08-2016
Conference in Jackson hole gave no answer to the question of when the fed will again raise interest rates, but identified challenges and opportunities, which carries with it the unprecedented growth of reserves in the financial system.

The new world of trillions of dollars in reserves

"For Central banks began brave new world (Brave New World, a reference to the dystopian novel by Aldous Huxley. — RBC)" — proclaimed on the sidelines of the annual conference held 26-28 August in the mountain resort of Jackson hole (Wyoming), President of the Federal reserve Bank of Atlanta Dennis Lockhart (quoted by Reuters). Monetary policy now works in the context of the unprecedented huge reserves that banks hold at the fed, writes in a scientific paper presented in Jackson hole, Professor Ricardo Reis of the London school of Economics.

Before the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in 2008, the excess reserves of banks accounts at the fed (over mandatory reserves) was less than $2 billion, and now reach $2.3 trillion. "In other words, the market for Bank reserves in the Central Bank has undergone a 1000-fold increase," — said in materials for a conference in Jackson hole Professor at new York University Laura Veldkamp. Today, the management of these reserves is becoming a Central part of the discussions about monetary policy and its transmission mechanism", she said.

The explosive growth of reserves is almost exclusively the result of the quantitative easing program (QE) which the fed conducted in 2009-2014: it funded a large-scale purchase of securities a provision in favor of banks.

Reserves is a one — day (overnight) deposits, which the fed charges banks percentage (currently at the rate of 0.5% per annum), is actually equivalent to short-term debt issued by the fed, said Reis. It's not the money, but any Bank may at any time request from the Central Bank excess reserves, exchange for banknotes in the ratio of one to one. Not only the fed has increased its balance sheet by issuing reserves, which bear interest, — as did the ECB, the Bank of England and Bank of Japan. Until 2007 this practice was almost non-existent, emphasizes the economist.

"Our ability to use interest on reserves is likely to play a key role in the coming years", — said the head of the fed Janet Yellen on Friday in a keynote speech at the conference. Reis in his work puts forward the idea, which he calls a "somewhat radical": the Central Bank can refuse payment of fixed interest on reserves, and instead to link the payment to inflation. If prices in the economy are below the target level, the Central Bank may reduce the return on reserves, and this, in turn, prostimulirujte banks to lend instead to hold reserves in Central Bank — as a result prices will rise. "When the Central Bank offers lower payments on reserves, they become a less attractive investment," says Reis.


The new purpose of the fed's balance sheet

The QE program, which was financed by creating Bank reserves, has led to the increase in assets, the fed's pre-crisis $900 billion to an unprecedented $4.5 trillion at the moment. Strategy the fed's "normalization" promises a gradual reduction in its balance sheet (through the future rejection of the reinvestment of proceeds from redeemable bonds in the portfolio of the Federal reserve and/or sale of these assets to their maturity): if this is not done, then in the future when economic growth will accelerate, a huge mass of excess reserves can be transformed into credit overheating. "If you sell the assets [from the portfolio of the fed] is too slow may result in excessive inflationary pressures," he warned on Friday, Yellen.

However, three economists from Harvard's Robin Greenwood, Samuel Hanson and Jeremy Stein (the latter worked at the fed in 2012-2014) in another paper presented in Jackson hole, looked at the bloated fed balance sheet, not as a problem but as an opportunity. They believe that the fed can afford "indefinitely" to keep the balance on the current level of $4.5 trillion — more than that, it may be necessary as a tool of maintenance of financial stability. The fact that in recent years the private sector has significantly increased the tendency of banks and nonbank financial intermediaries to the issue of short-term debt instruments, approaching cash equivalents. The fed may use its balance sheet for the placing on the market of similar instruments, thereby reducing incentives for the private financial sector to issue too much short debt. "Given the systemic risk factors associated with a tendency to the shortening of funding from the private sector, for the state, it is advisable to be an aggressive provider of secure short-term obligations, encouraging private firms to the lengthening of the structure of their funding," write the authors of the study.

Banks, non-Bank institutions and even households show a huge demand for risk free liquid assets, hoard record amounts of cash, confirms Veldkamp from new York University. Only in part this is due to the post-crisis tightening of regulation, a significant role is played by the increased level of fear and caution, as the global financial crisis has taught that even the most improbable risk may materialize, she writes.

Preparing for the future crisis

The conference in Jackson hole wondering what will the fed and other Central banks during the next economic crisis. From the speech of Yellen, it follows that the basic tools will be the ones that were actively used in recent years (reduction of interest rates, asset purchases, "statements of intent" — the so-called forward guidance), but their potential is more limited. For example, on average during a recession, the fed has historically reduced its key interest rate by 5.5 percentage points when a new recession this may prove to be unattainable, unless you decide on a negative nominal interest rates. But Yellen did not include negative rates in the list of potential tools to combat future crisis, and other fed officials, who spoke at Jackson hole, hinted that do not discuss negative rates in practice.

With them argue Marvin Goodfriend of Carnegie—Mellon in the 1990s and early 2000s led the research Department of the Federal reserve Bank of Richmond. "The next cyclical downturn — it's only a matter of time and when that happens, the question will arise about the aggressive actions in the area of negative rates," writes the economist's work is also represented in Jackson hole.

The conference was presented and more exotic ideas: for example, variations on the theme of "throwing money from helicopters" (goes back to Milton Friedman and implies free provision of printed Central Bank money to economic agents) in the work of Ricardo Reis. from the London school of Economics. Yellen in her speech said that the fed is not actively considering any additional tools and models, although they are important topics for research."

Ivan Tkachev


RELATED MATERIALS: Economy and Finance