Why target the audience Turkestan media decreased the number of materials on the topic of the rights of Muslims in China?

— Competent information campaign should be based on the understanding of the human psyche: man is a social animal and adapts to any phenomena, if they are sufficiently long-term in nature.

If a sufficiently long time to give the audience the shock of the content, it will get used to it and will perceive it as something quite natural, and it will begin to respond to the next piece of information with irritation. For example, it happened in Russia with Ukrainian-Syrian subjects.

Therefore, to achieve the desired effect makes sense to pause. Strictly speaking, if you take the information policy of the Western media in the region in political technology key anti-China campaign has reached its goal — in the society of the countries of the region sinapovska mood greatly appreciated. Will wait for the second wave.

In the information field of Kyrgyzstan and partly Tajikistan reduced the number of publications on the topic of "successful Chinese projects" in these countries. Why?

— In the information field of the region's three big players: USA, China and Russia. Pro-American media have already worked on this topic in a negative way, China is worried, and not without reason, that bravura reports about the achievements in economic cooperation will be interpreted as a continuation of neo-colonialist expansion in the region.

For Russia, any Chinese achievement involuntarily raises the question about their lost positions. All the major players continued the game on this field is currently unprofitable.

In General, China is not inclined to break the Alliance completely and always leave yourself room to maneuver. While Beijing has a range of measures of influence on those who disagree with his political course.

Strictly speaking, in the countries of Central Asia already exist, for example, discriminatory visa rules. To take a more assertive position of China may, for example, in the case of criticism of the policy in Xinjiang from the leadership of the countries in the region.

What is at the moment the result of the Chinese initiative "One belt and one road" in Turkestan?

— In fact, the "Belt and road" was conceived primarily as a road to Europe. Given the General foreign policy of the leading countries of Europe, this goal is far from achievement. With some success, Beijing has been achieved in the countries of southern Europe, but overestimate them not worth it.

The countries of Central Asia was seen primarily as transit areas, but in fact steel, not least by the efforts of Moscow, mildly hindering the implementation of Chinese projects in its own territory end points of Chinese communication.

China has taken in the former Soviet Union a dominant position, but the negative aspects of the Chinese presence became apparent to all, and positive experience is somehow sparse. Chinese investment was too corruption-and setorientation.

See also: China is changing the sign: Beijing abandons the "One belt One road"

Really the advent of Chinese military bases in the countries of Turkestan?

— If to exclude the possibility of dramatic domestic political changes in China, it is absolutely inevitable. While maintaining the current policy in the region and the stability of the situation in Xinjiang, it'll probably happen within five years.

Eugenia Kim

Source: https://telegra.ph/Voennye-bazy-Kitaya-poyavyatsya-v-Turkestane-v-techenie-pyati-let--mnenie-04-01

Tags: China