Center for Strategic Assessment and forecasts

Autonomous non-profit organization

Home / Politics and Geopolitics / Great Arab Revolution / Articles
Bilderberg 2011: the New world order of Rockefeller and the "high priests of globalization"
Material posted: Publication date: 19-08-2011

The aim of the global elite, perhaps most clearly represented by Bilderberg, is not the salvation of the American Empire from collapsing, and assumption of the elevation of [any] new Empire; but rather to organize the collapse of the American Empire for a completely new system of global governance.

What issues were resolved at the annual meeting of the Bilderberg club in 2011 that is on the agenda of the global elite at the moment, as well as the most detailed consecration of the main activities of the organization, says the article, Andrew Gavin Marshall from the website, a translation of which with our small review we offer.

The claim that we are committed to a single world government is exaggerated but not totally unfair. Those of our colleagues in the Bilderberg club, I feel that we can not continue the endless war with each other, to kill people, and leave millions of people without a roof over your head. Therefore, we think that a single global community would be a good thing.

- Denis Healey (Denis Healey), member of the steering Committee of the Bilderberg group.

1. The Foundation of the Bilderberg group

The Bilderberg Group founded in 1954, was established in the Netherlands as a secret club that meets once a year, and consisting of about 130 members of the political, financial, military, academic, media elites from North America and Western Europe as "an informal network of influential people who could consult each other privately and in private".

Regular participants include the CEOs or chairmen of the boards of Directors of some of the world's largest corporations, oil companies such as Royal Dutch Shell, British Petroleum, or Total, of the European monarchs, international bankers such as David Rockefeller, presidents, Prime Ministers and heads of major global banks.

The Bilderberg Group acts as a "secretive global think-tank, the initial goal of which was to establish relations of governments and the leaders of the economies of Europe and North America during the Cold war.

In the early 1950s, the highest representatives of the European elites worked with selected American elites to form the Bilderberg group for the purpose of joining together the most influential people on both sides of the Atlantic to advance the cause of "Atlanticism" and "globalism." In the list of participants included leading politicians, international businessmen, bankers, heads of research centers and foundations, top academics and University leaders, diplomats, media barons, top military officials, and Bilderberg also included several heads of state, monarchs, high-ranking intelligence officers, including senior officials from the CIA, which, in fact, was the main financier for the first meeting in 1954.

One of the European founders of the Bilderberg group included Joseph Retinger (Joseph Retinger) and Prince Bernhard (Prince Bernhard) from the Netherlands. Prince Bernhard, by the way, three years prior to his marrying the Dutch Queen Juliana, until 1934 he was a member of the Nazi party and also worked for the German industrial giant, I. G. Farben, the manufacturer of the gas Zyklon B used in concentration camps.

On the American side, among those who were best known, in the formation of the Bilderberg group were: David Rockefeller (David Rockefeller), Dean rusk (Dean Rusk), the highest official of the Council on foreign relations (Council on Foreign Relations) who was then head of the Rockefeller Foundation), Joseph Johnson (Joseph Johnson), another Council leader who was head of the Carnegie Foundation and John George. McCloy (John J. McCloy), the Supreme leader of the Council, who in 1953 became Chairman of the Chase Manhattan Bank and was also Chairman of the Board of the Ford Foundation.

The fact that the big American foundations – Rockefeller, Carnegie and Ford – played a key role in the origin of the Bilderberg Group is not a mere coincidence. These Funds, since their inception in the early 20th century, were the Central institutions in constructing consensus among elites, as well as resolving contradictions in power structures. Simply put, they have become the engines of social engineering: how to elite circles in particular, and for society as a whole. Professor Robert F. Arnove (Robert F. Arnove wrote in his book "Charitable and cultural imperialism" (Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism):

Funds, such funds Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Ford have a corrosive influence on a democratic society, they are unregulated and intractable given the concentration of power and wealth which buy talent, generate motivation and, in fact, sets the agenda, what receives public attention. They serve as a retarding structures, delaying and preventing more radical, structural changes. They help maintain an economic and political order, international in scope, that benefits only the ruling class [....] it is a system that ... works against the interests of minorities, the working class and peoples of the third world.

These funds were Central figures in the promotion of the ideology of "globalism", they laid the Foundation for such organizations as the Council on foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group. The Rockefeller Foundation, in particular, supported several organizations that promoted the philosophy of "liberal internationalism," which aims to:

Support of foreign policy in the framework of the ideology of the new world order, which was United States's leading power — a program that was characterized by the Rockefeller Foundation as "disinterested", "objective" and even "non-political"... the Construction of a new international consensus required the conscious, targeted funding, as individuals and organizations – all those who doubted and undermined the foundations of the "old order", while promoting "new".

Major foundations funded and created not only politically oriented institutes such as think tanks, but they also play a key role in the organization of universities and educational institutions, in particular, the study of international relations. The impact of funding for education and universities and, thus, "knowledge" themselves, is unprecedented. As noted in the book "Charitable and cultural imperialism":

"The power of funds is not to dictate what should be studied. Their power consists in defining professional and intellectual parameters, in determining who will receive support in the study of vital topics and issues. Therefore, the government funds is that they offer certain types of activities in which they are interested, and who are willing to support. As noted by political scientist and economist Harold Laski (Harold Laski) that "funds do not control, simply because in the direct and ordinary sense of the word, they do not need to do this. They need only provide a field of interest to them, resulting in a whole University world find the fact that it will certainly mean that his intellectual compass will always gravitate to this side."

Major philanthropic foundations created by American industrial "robber barons and bankers, contrary to their stated objectives, were not created for the benefit of mankind, but in the interests of the elite bankers and Industrialists – as an effective means of social engineering.

Through banks, these powerful families controlled the global economy; through think tanks, they manage to control the political and foreign ministries, and through the funds, they are manipulated by society in accordance with their own plans and interests. Through these foundations, elites had the opportunity to shape the processes, ideas and educational institutions, which ensures their continued hegemony over society through the production and control of knowledge. Educational institutions train the future elite for the governmental structures, Economics, science and other professional environments, and produces scientists who are the main participants in think tanks such as the Bilderberg Group.

Private foundations effectively blur the boundaries between public and private sector, simultaneously affecting the separation of these areas in the study of social Sciences. This boundary erosion between public and private spheres "adds feudal elements to our (alleged) democracy, however, it has nothing resists, no one protests against this state of Affairs, this fact is oblivious of the political elite or sociologists almost no one."

Zbigniew Brzezinski, a strategist in the field of foreign relations, former Director of the Council on foreign relations, member of the Bilderberg group and, along with David Rockefeller co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, wrote that the blurring of the boundaries "helps to the world dominance of the United States." (Not the United States, and representatives of financial groups, has chosen a home base of this country.

Just as American approaches gradually permeate the world, this creates more favorable conditions for indirect and seemingly voluntary, of American hegemony. And, like the case of the domestic American system, that hegemony involves a complex structure blocking between organizations and procedures, designed to generate consensus and obscure asymmetries in power and influence.

In 1915 US Congress has conducted an investigation into the activities of philanthropic foundations, which was called the Commission of Walsh (Walsh Commission), which in its conclusions warned that "the power of wealth is able to suppress democratic culture and politics". The final report of the Commission, Walsh "suggested that it is highly likely that the funds pursue their own goals in society, and not the problem of society". In this context, we can come to an understanding that the evolution of the Bilderberg group as an international think tank, aims at constructing consensus and entrenchment of ideology among the elite.

From their first meetings, the club members focused on the following broad areas, which remained the center of discussion and at subsequent meetings: communism and the Soviet Union; the dependent region and people abroad; economic policies and problems; European integration and the European defence community.

Almost every American participant in the Bilderberg meetings was also a member of the Council on foreign Relations. Among the most notable members of the Bilderberg Group from the beginning were David Rockefeller, Dean rusk (Dean Rusk), John Maclay (John J. McCloy), George McGee (George McGhee, George ball (George Ball, Walt Whitman Rostow (Walt Whitman Rostow, McGeorge Bundy (McGeorge Bundy, Arthur Dean (Arthur Dean), and Paul NITC (Paul Nitze). Wrote political sociologist Stephen Gill Stephen Gill), "in the American sector was dominated by the interests of Rockefeller."

In the Bilderberg group was definitely present interests and Rothschild: Edmond De Rothschild was a member of the Steering Committee, and Franco Bernabe, Vice Chairman of Rothschild Europe, at the present time among the members of the Steering Committee, the interests of the Rockefeller, however, seem almost dominant. (We believe that the influence of a group of Rothschild, deliberately downplayed and is diverted into the shadows, meanwhile, there is reason to believe that the influence of Rothschild in the 20th and 21st centuries is not only not decreased but even increased, but became less visible to neposvyathennyh.

Not enough that David Rockefeller is the only private person from all the members of the Advisory group of the Steering Committee, but close confidants Rockefeller long ago joined the steering Committee and was involved with the organization, such as: Sharon Percy Rockefeller Sharon Percy Rockefeller; George ball, a long time leader in the Council on foreign Relations, who was Undersecretary of state for economic Affairs in the administrations of Kennedy and Johnson; Henry Kissinger, long-time Rockefeller aide and American Imperial strategist; Zbigniew Brzezinski, who became one of the founders of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller; Joseph E. Johnson, a former employee of the US state Department and the President of the Carnegie endowment for international Peace; John J. McCloy, former Chairman the Council on foreign relations (replaced by David Rockefeller), former assistant Secretary of defense, the Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank (where he was replaced by David Rockefeller), former Trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation, Chairman of the Ford Foundation, and world Bank President James Wolfensohn, former world Bank President and Trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation.

One of the current members of the steering Committee, which acts not only as the representative of the interests of the Rockefellers, but all pervasive influence and role of the major foundations is Jessica T. Matthews (Jessica T. Matthews). She is President of the Carnegie endowment for international Peace, who acted in the interests of the National Security Council under Zbigniew Brzezinski, was a senior research fellow at the Council on foreign Relations, where David Rockefeller remains in the role of honorary Chairman, member of the Trilateral Commission, a Trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation, and served on the boards of Directors of the Brookings institution (Brookings Institution), the Rockefeller brothers Fund and the Joyce Foundation Joyce Foundation ).

2. Bilderberg and the European Union

Joseph Retinger (Joseph Retinger), one of the founders of the Bilderberg club, was also one of the first architects of the European common market and a leading intellectual champion of European integration. In 1946, speaking at the Royal Institute of international Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs), the British counterpart of Council on foreign Relations, he said that Europe, for the creation of a Federal Union of the European countries, it is necessary to renounce part of their sovereignty". Retinger was the founder of the European movement (EM), a lobbying organization dedicated to the creation of a Federal Europe. Retinger had provided financial support for the European movement from powerful us financial institutions such as the Council on foreign Relations and the Rockefellers. It is also important to note that after the Second World war, the basic Finance at the Council on foreign Relations came from the Carnegie Corporation, the Ford Foundation and, in particular, of the Rockefeller Foundation.

In addition Retinger, the founder of the Bilderberg Group and the pan-European Movement, another ideological founder of European integration was Jean Monnet (Jean Monnet), who founded the Committee of Action (Action Committee) of the United States of Europe (ACUE), an organization whose goal was the promotion of European integration, and he was also the main driving face and the first President of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the forerunner of the European Common Market.

Declassified (2001), documents show that "the U.S. intelligence community in the 50-s and 60-ies carried out a special campaign whose goal was to encourage the unification of Europe. It funded and directed the European federalist movement". These documents revealed that "America makes a lot of effort behind the scenes to push Britain into a European state. (In our opinion quite a controversial statement – we believe that in reality the situation was quite the opposite

One Memorandum, dated 26 July 1950, gave instructions to the campaign, which was to contribute to the creation of a fully functional European Parliament. The document is signed by General William j. Donovan William J Donovan), a former during the Second World war, the head of the office of Strategic Services, predecessor of the CIA. In the future, "the main tool of Washington, on the formation of the European agenda was the American Committee for a United Europe, created in 1948. Its Chairman was Donovan, ostensibly by the time private lawyer, and the Vice President was Allen DULLES (Allen Dulles), which in 50 years was Director of the CIA. The Board included Walter Bedell Smith (Walter Bedell Smith), the first Director of the CIA, and a number of former employees and managers of the OSS (OSS), part of which worked directly in the structures of the CIA, then [some time] outside the organization.

These documents show that ACUE financed the European Movement, was the most important federalist organization in the post-war years." Interestingly, the leaders of the pan-European movement, as Rettinger, Robert Schuman and the former Belgian Prime Minister Paul-Henry Spaak (Paul-Henri Spaak) – all considered employees at their American sponsors. The U.S. role in the process is viewed as a classic covert operation. ACUE funding was from foundations Ford and Rockefeller, as well as by business organizations, closely associated with the American government."

The European Coal and Steel community Community (European Coal and Steel Community) was founded in 1951 and it included France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. Recently disclosed documents of the meetings of the Bilderberg meeting of 1955, show that the main topic of discussion was "European Union" and that "the discussion endorsed the full support of the idea of integration and unification from the representatives of the six Nations comprising the European Coal and Steel community present at the conference."

In the future, "speaker from Europe expressed concern about the necessity of coming to a common currency and noted that from his point of view, this necessity entails the need for Central political power." Interestingly, the United States representative reaffirmed that the United States has not weakened his passionate support for the ideas of integration, despite the fact that in the USA there was considerable variation in views as to how this enthusiasm should be expressed. Another participant from the United States urged his European friends to go ahead with the unification of Europe with less emphasis on the ideological side, and, above all, to be practical and work fast." Thus, at the 1955 meeting, the main agenda was set to create a European common market.

In 1957, two years later, was signed the Roman agreement which created the European Economic Community (EEC), also known as the European Community. For decades, many others have signed agreements, and the European Community joined by new members. In 1992 was signed Maastritch agreement that created the European Union and led to the creation of the Euro.

The European Monetary Institute was established in 1994, the European Central Bank was founded in 1998, and the Euro started trading in 1999. Etienne Davignon (Etienne Davignon, Chairman, Bilderberg Group and former EU Commissioner, in March 2009 revealed that the introduction of the Euro was debated and planned at Bilderberg conferences.

The European Constitution (renamed the Lisbon Treaty) was a move towards a European superstate, creating the posts of Minister of foreign Affairs of the EU, and with it, coordinating foreign policy, in fact, handing Britain the right to represent all member States of the EU in the UN security Council, prompting the country "actively and unreservedly" follow an EU foreign policy; to create a framework for the creation of the defense policy of the EU, as an appendage to NATO, or a separate structure; to create a European system of justice, the including "minimum standards in defining offences and sentencing" and develop a common policy on asylum and immigration; it also gave the EU the power "to guarantee the coordination of policies economy and employment, and European laws prevail over the laws of all member States, thus, turning the member States into a simple province, in the framework of a centralized Federal government system.

This Constitution was mainly written by valéry Giscard D'estaing (Giscard d'estaing Valéry), President of the French Republic from 1974 to 1981. It so happened that Giscard D'estaing is a member of the Bilderberg group, Trilateral Commission and also a close friend and collaborator of Henry Kissinger.

This agreement, adopted in 2009, created the post of President of the European Council who would represent the EU on the world stage and be controlled by the Council which determines the political direction of the EU. The first President of the European Council was Herman van Rompy (Herman Van Rompuy, a former Prime Minister of Belgium. November 12, 2009, held a small Bilderberg meeting, which was arranged Viscount Etienne Davignon (Etienne Davignon, Chairman, Bilderberg group, which included international politicians and Industrialists, among whom was Henry Kissinger.

Herman Rampe joined the Bilderberg session to present the situation on the European labour market, calling for the adoption of the new system of taxation for EU funding to continue to avoid annual budget battles." As President, van Rompy, gave a speech in which he said, "we are experiencing exceptionally difficult times: the financial crisis and its dramatic impact on employment and budgets, the climate crisis which threatens our very survival – the period of anxiety, uncertainty and insecurity. However, these problems can be overcome through joint efforts in our countries and in the [cooperation] between them. 2009 is the first year of global governance with the establishment of the G20 in the middle of the financial crisis; the climate conference in Copenhagen is a new step towards the global management of our planet."

Of information leaks from the Bilderberg meeting 2011 in Switzerland: the Eurozone is experiencing a major crisis, and the members of the Bilderberg group trying to save the glass house from the fact that it is not shattered into pieces. One of the most important topics that were discussed this year, according to information from Daniel Estulin (Daniel Estulin) journalist, specializing in the study of issues related to the Bilderberg group (who reportedly has inside sources that discharge to it information which in the past has been very accurate), at the last Bilderberg meeting discussed the situation in Greece, which is likely to get worse with the next round of crisis on the horizon, continuing social unrest and its possible exit from the Euro zone.

The problems of Greece, Ireland and the global economy as a whole, was the subject of discussion this year. Representatives from Greece included George Papaconstantinou (George Papaconstantinou), Minister of Finance of Greece, as well as several bankers and businessmen.

Among the key players of the EU, attended the meeting this year was the first President of the European Council, Herman van Rompy, who in that capacity received an invitation to a private Bilderberg meeting in 2009, where he gave a speech defending the unified taxes throughout the EU, allowing the EU not to rely entirely on the participating countries, but have their own resources."

No surprise that van Rompy who had stated that "2009 is the first year of global governance" was among the guests of the conference. Other key EU officials who attended the meeting this year was Almunia of Joaquin (Joaquín Almunia, Vice President of the European Commission; Frans van Del (Frans van Daele, President of the European Council van Rompy; Neely Crows ( Neelie Kroes, Vice President of the European Commission; and, of course, Jean-Claude Triche ( Jean-Claude Trichet), President of the European Central Bank.

As in every meeting, the Bilderberg Group has an official list of participants, and there are those members who are present at the meetings, but whose names do not appear in any official press release. At the meeting this year, judging from reports from various sources, was attended by such dignitaries as the Secretary General of NATO Anders Rasmussen (Anders Rasmussen), which in General is not a surprise, considering that the NATO Secretary General is usually present at every meeting; Jose Luis Zapatero (Jose Luis Zapatero Prime Minister of Spain; Angela Merkel, German Chancellor; bill gates, co-chair of the bill and Melinda gates Foundation and former head of Microsoft; Robert gates, the outgoing Defense Minister. The Guardian also reported that these "unofficial guests" were spotted at the conference or information about their presence "leaked" to the press. It is reported that Angela Merkel, has in the past been attending the meetings, so her presence this year, in General, is not a surprise.

At recent meetings, European officials have discussed the need for the EU to take "strong concentration of power" in the face of serious economic crisis threatening Europe and the world. Without such a concentration of power, both the Euro and the European Union as a whole threatens a likely collapse scenario is an anathema to everything the Bilderberg group has tried to achieve in their entire 57-year history. Simply put, the purpose of this policy is within the EU in relation to member countries of the Union, when the EU will be able to punish countries not following the rules, as one of bilderberga said at the meeting: "we have embarked on the formation of real economic government." At the moment, this statement could not be independently confirmed, however, we have a lot of documented public statements by European members of the Bilderberg club, and it was obvious that such a statement could be made in reality.

Shortly before the meeting, the President of the European Central Bank, Jean-Claude Trichet, said "governments need the establishment of the Ministry of Finance for foreign exchange in the region of 17 countries, as a bloc, to combat extensive, affecting the entire region's sovereign debt crisis". Trichet said, "whether it's too bold for an economic space with a single market, single currency, single Central Bank, to consider the need for unified Ministry of Finance?". Further, in the same vein with this idea, and all ideas put forward at the Bilderberg meeting, approving the "concentration of power", Trichet said he supports "the transfer of EU rights to veto the budget measures of countries that are "dangerous wandering", even though it requires changes in international agreements of the EU". According to Trichet, such the Ministry of Finance would have the authority, at least in three areas":

These powers will include "first of all, the surveillance of fiscal policies and policies in the area of competitiveness" and "direct authority" over countries with tax troubles," he said. They will also carry out "all the typical Executive powers, in relation to the integrated financial sector of the European Union to accompany the full integration of financial services, and, thirdly, to represent the European Confederation in international financial institutions".

Last year, Belgian Prime Minister Yves Leterme (Yves Leterme endorsed such an idea of "European Economic government' when he stated:

"The idea of a strong economic government already laid out on the table and will develop in the future. In the end, the European Debt Agency or something similar will become a reality. I believe in this. We are talking about European financial stability, not about ideological debates on federalism. I myself am a federalist. But the main and deeper integration are the logical consequences of owning the common currency."

Of course, this is not a surprise, given that the predecessor Laterna was Herman van Rompy, the current participant of the Bilderberg meetings and the EU President, a staunch advocate of "economic government". Plans for "economic government" require a serious commitment on the part of France and Germany, perhaps this explains the appearance of Merkel Bilderberg. In March 2010, the governments of France and Germany, released the rough draft, which for the purpose of "strengthening the coordination of financial policy in the EU".

This plan, which wrote the German newspaper Der Spiegel, calls for increased monitoring of the competitiveness of individual member States, so as to have the opportunity to take action in the early stages of occurrence of problems." The Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Jean Claude Juncker (Jean-Claude Juncker) in response to the plan stated: "we need a European economic government in the sense of strengthened coordination of economic policies within the Euro area". In December 2010, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Sebl ( Wolfgang Schaeuble) said that "in the next 10 years we will have a structure that is much more related to what is called political Union".

Reportedly the German press in early 2011, Germany and France have had disagreements on certain aspects of such "economic government". However, Merkel said, "we have already discussed the issue of an economic government for a long time," and "something we currently think, is another step in this direction." However, the difference between the two approaches mainly lies in the following:

France would prefer to see the European Council, which would include heads of state and government of member States of the EU, turned into a sort of economic government. As in the first stage should be involved only countries — members of the Eurozone, French Finance Minister and member of the Bilderberg club [the current head of the IMF] Christine de La Harpe, called the project "16 plus."

The representatives of Germany focused on completely different things. They would prefer to have an existing emergency Fund replaced by the so-called European stability mechanism in 2013. According to these agreements, in response to any help in need money of the country became subject to austerity. Mario Draghi (Mario Draghi), the current President of the Bank of Italy and member of the Board of the Bank for International Settlements — BIS (BIS) (Central Bank for the world's Central Banks). In an interview published on the website of the BIS (BIS) in March of 2010, Mario Draghi stated that in response to the Greek crisis "in the Eurozone we need more rigorous economic management, promote a more coordinated structural reforms and more discipline."

Mario Draghi was also a member of the conference of the Bilderberg group. Perhaps it is no surprise that Mario Draghi was supported by Eurozone Finance Ministers in order for him to take the post of head of the European Central Bank after Jean-Claude Trichet, who must leave his post in October 2011.

Obviously, the construction of a European economic government will continue in the coming years, especially if the economic crisis continues. As stated by the outgoing IMF managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn, a longtime member of the Bilderberg club, "crisis is opportunity". Bilderberg, while not omnipotent, will do everything possible to prevent the collapse of the Euro, or the end of the European Union. Bilderberg, after all, from the beginning, made the "European integration" one of its main goals. In the official biography of one of the founders of Bilderberg and its Chairman for a long time Prince Bernhard, the Bilderberg group has been called "the birthplace of the European community".

3. Regime change and the IMF?

Christine Lagarde, the French Finance Minister, who was a Central figure in the initial planning process of the "European economic government" – is also considered among the main candidates for the post of head the IMF (already is the head of the IMF IMF managing Director always attends the Bilderberg meetings, the only exception was this year, for the reason that its Director, Dominique Strauss-kannu was charged with sexual harassment in new York; however, senior positions are usually retained for those who were invited to the Bilderberg group at least once. While the race for the post is still not finished (it's finished, and Lagarde became head of the IMF worth noting is that Christine Lagarde attended a Bilderberg meeting in 2009. Does that make her chances higher, or in the near future we expect surprises?

4. A place for China in the New World order?

Insider sources independent journalist Daniel Estulin, misleading, a fairly intense debate about the role of China that is hardly a huge surprise, given that it was already the main topic of discussion at the Bilderberg meetings for the past several years. China emerged in discussions on the topic of Pakistan, because China began to turn into the closest economic and political ally of this country, a trend that continues, as America continues to spread the Afghan war into the regions adjacent to Pakistan.

China is also the largest player in Africa, threatening the Western networks, scattered across the continent, in particular the world Bank and the IMF. Most important, however, and regardless of his roles in Pakistan and Africa, China has become the largest economic competitor for the United States in the world and, as the IMF recently noted, it is expected that the Chinese economy will surpass the U.S. by 2016. Bilderberg paid attention to this fact, not just as a financial and economic issue, but as a massive geopolitical change in the world: "the biggest event of our time."

What made the discussion on China at this year's meeting unique is that it included two attendees from China for the first time since the inception of the club. These two guests were Huang Yibin (Huang Yiping), the eminent Professor of Economics from Peking University (Chinese Harvard), and Fu Ying (Fu Ying), Deputy Minister of foreign Affairs of China. This is a very unusual and speaks about the importance of the upcoming debate, given the fact that Bilderberg is exclusively a European and North American (Atlantic) organization, and in the past, when Bilderberg members David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski suggested to allow Japan to participate at the meeting in 1972, the Europeans rejected the offer and instead of Bilderberg in 1973 he formed the Trilateral Commission to integrate the elites of Western Europe, North America and Japan.

The tripartite Commission, in the end, in 2000, expanded the Japanese section in the "Pacific Asian group" to include not only Japan but South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand.

In 2009, the G 20 or the so-called Big twenty were empowered to "manage" the global economic crisis – to include the "growing" economic giants, particularly China and India – and as a member of the Bilderberg club, Jean Claude Trichet (Jean-Claude Trichet) marked the emergence of the big twenty, as the main groups of global governance".

The same year the newly appointed President of the EU Herman van Rompy, called "first year of global governance". No surprise that also in 2009, China and India were invited as official members of the Trilateral Commission. This indicates the growing role of India and especially China in global Affairs, and participation in Bilderberg meetings emphasizes the aim to not alienate China from the established existing institutions, ideologies and systems of global power, but to more fully integrate China into the system.

The aim of the global elite, perhaps most clearly represented by Bilderberg, is not the salvation of the American Empire from collapsing, and assumption of the elevation of [any] new Empire; but rather to organize the collapse of the American Empire for a completely new system of global governance. (This is what seems to us the most important point of this material.

This "great idea" is impossible without China's participation, and thus, as Bilderberg for a long time, was imbued with the ideology of "global governance", is not a surprise the fact that, in the end, were invited to China. More of a surprise is the fact that it took so much time.

5. Build whether Bilderberg World government?

Jon Ronson wrote an article in the Guardian newspaper, in which he managed to interview key members of the Bilderberg Group in the attempt to debunk "conspiracy theories" surrounding the secrecy of these meetings. However, instead, in these interviews, continued to emerge information regarding the public importance of the Bilderberg group.

Ronson attempted to contact David Rockefeller, but he only managed to reach his press Secretary who told Ronson that the "conspiracy theories" around the Rockefeller and global think tanks, like the Bilderberg, he is "absolutely fed up". According to his press Secretary, "views of Mr. Rockefeller on the subject, lies in the fact that all this time there was a battle between rational and irrational thought. Rational people gave preference to globalization. Irrational – opted nationalism."

Trying to dispel "conspiracy theories" on the subject, that Bilderberg "runs the world" Ronson explained that members of the Bilderberg Group, whom he interviewed, admitted that "the Bilderberg session from time to time had an impact on international Affairs." Denis Healey (Denis Healey), who was a member of the steering Committee of the Bilderberg group for over 30 years, explained:

Exaggeration to say that we want a single world government, however, some truth in this. Bilderberg members understand that we cannot continue to fight each other just to kill people and leave millions homeless.

Therefore, we think that a unified community that includes the whole world would be a good thing.... Bilderberg is a way to bring together politicians, Industrialists, financiers and journalists. Policy should involve [influential] people who are not professional politicians. We have focused to bring together young rising politicians, and to bring them together with financiers and Industrialists, who can tell them a few words of wisdom. This increases the chances that we will get a sensible global policy.

Will Hutton, former editor of the Observer, which was several times invited to the Bilderberg meetings in the past, is the author of the famous phrase in which he defined the group as "high priests of globalization."

Hutton said that "people participate in all these networks to influence the way the world works", and to create, as he put it, "the international common sense" policies. The Chairman of the Bilderberg group, Viscount Etienne Davignon, stated that , "I don't think (we are) a global ruling class because I don't think a global ruling class exists. I just think that people who have influence interested to speak with people who have influence."

G. William Domhoff, who is a Professor of psychology and sociology at the University of Santa Cruz, California, in an interview about Bilderberg group dispelled the idea that the study of such groups is the prerogative of the marginal supporters of the conspiracy theory, and instead explained that he studies "how, through such publicly observable organizations as corporate boards and network planning policy elites strive to develop [they need] a consensus. Meanwhile, it can be studied in detail, as the information reported in the media, at least half accurate"

Bilderbergtsy over a long period of time were advocates of world government and "world government", and "crisis" is always the best means through which they can achieve their goals. As, for example, the crisis in Greece made louder calls for the need to create "European economic governance", an idea that appeared much earlier, the moment that Greece was affected by the crisis, in the same way, the global economic crisis is a pretext to promote the idea of "global economic governance".

Former IMF Managing Director, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, in may 2010 stated that "crisis is opportunity," and called for "a new global currency issued by a global Central Bank, with a solid governance and institutional features", and that "this global Central Bank, should serve as the lender acting as the last financial safe haven". However, he said, "I'm afraid we're too far from a similar level of global cooperation". Unless, of course, the world will continue to turn into financial and economic ruin, but now this is what takes place that any keen economic observer, can be easily observed.

The results of the April G20 summit of 2009, plans were announced for the introduction of a new global currency that will replace the American dollar as the world reserve currency." In paragraph 19 of the communiqué issued by the G20 at the end of the summit stated, "in order to increase global liquidity, we agreed to maintain a General location of the currency the SDR (SDR), which will be held the injection of $250 billion into the world economy".

SDRs (the SDR or special drawing rights "are the synthetic paper monetary unit of the International monetary Fund.

As reported by the Telegraph – "the Leaders of Big Twenty", activated VVF power to create money and pursue quantitative monetary liberalization or quantitative easing. Thus, they de facto bring into play a global currency, which turns out tot he control of any sovereign government".

The Washington Post reports that the IMF is ready to become "a true analog of the UN for the global economy: it will so greatly expand its powers, acting as a global banker to governments rich and poor. And with more flexibility to effectively print its own money, it will get the opportunity to carry out the injection of liquidity into global markets in a way previously only possible for major Central banks including the us Federal Reserve... the IMF is anything but a shoo-in to play a Central role in global financial policy, therefore, is Washington prepared to become the power center for global financial policy, just as the UN have turned new York into a center of world diplomacy."

(of course, this is also misleading, as after the IMF currency replace the dollar as the world reserve currency, the political fate of the United States as a global Empire solved. And this, in fact, is the plan of the global "elite" of the international, which is actually written in the text of this article above.

While the IMF, literally pushed to the forefront of the global currency agenda, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) remained the real power in the "global control". According to the IMF magazine "Finance and Development" which in 2009 stated, "the BIS, founded in 1930, is the oldest and Central focal point for the coordination of activities of global governance". Jean-Claude Trichet, President of the European Central Bank (ECB) and long-standing participant of the Bilderberg meetings, delivered a speech at the Council on foreign Relations in April 2010, in which he explained that "the significant transformation of global governance that we're working on currently, can be illustrated by three examples":

The first is the emergence of G-20 as the primary group for global economic governance at the level of Ministers, governors, heads of States and governments.

Second – the establishment of Global Economic Meetings for Central Bank governors under the auspices of the Bank for International settlements as the primary group to manage the cooperation of Central banks.

And, third, expanding membership of the Financial Stability Board to include all the systemic emerging market economies.

In concluding his speech, Trichet emphasized that "the essence of global governance is to strongly improve the ability of the global financial system to withstand failures". The following month, Trichet spoke at the Bank of Korea, where he said, "cooperation of Central banks, is part of a larger trend that will transform global governance, which actually spurred the global financial crisis", and that "s why it is not a surprise that this crisis has even led to greater awareness of their increased economic importance and need for full integration into the global system of governance".

Once again, Trichet identified the BIS and its "various fora" – such as the global Economic Meeting, and the Financial Stability Board – as the "main channel" for cooperation of Central banks.

If you want to get more information on the topic of "Global government" and the global economic crisis, read the article by Andrew Gavin Marshall Andrew Gavin Marshall) – "Crisis is opportunity": the Creation of a global depression to create a Global Government," Global Research, 26 October 2010.

6. Rockefeller's Dream

David Rockefeller celebrated his 96 birthday during the last weekend of the Bilderberg meeting, and is one of, if not the only survivor of the founders of the group in 1954. If the Bilderberg Group represents the "high priests of globalization," then David Rockefeller is her "Dad".

James Wolfensohn (James Wolfensohn), shows the importance of the Rockefellers not only for America, but for the process of globalization in General. James D. Wolfensohn, born in Australia, was President of the world Bank from 1995 to 2005, and since then has founded and managed his private firm, Wolfensohn & Company, LLC.

He has also been a member of the Steering Committee of the Bilderberg Group and an honorary Trustee at the Brookings institution (Brookings Institution, a major American think tank), and a Trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation and is a member of the Council on foreign Relations. Wolfensohn's father, Hyman, was working for James Armand de Rothschild, James Armand de Rothschild of the banking dynasty of the Rothschilds, after whom James was named.

His father taught him how to "cultivate mentors, friends and influential acquaintances. Wolfensohn rose quickly in the financial world and, like his father, who lived in the service of the Rothschilds, the dominant family of the 19th century – James Wolfensohn lives in service to the Rockefellers, who are probably the dominant family of the 20th century. On the occasion of the 90th anniversary of David Rockefeller, James Wolfensohn, speaking at the Council on foreign Relations, said:

The man who had a huge impact in a professional sense in this country, and I'm very happy to say that later in person, that's David Rockefeller, who first met me at the Harvard Business School in 1957 or 1958.. [early 20th century] as we looked at the world, family, the Rockefeller family, decided that these issues were not just national for the United States, not just treat the rich countries. And where unusual and strikingly grandfather of David has created the Rockefeller Foundation, whose goal was the development of a global vision.

...So that the Rockefeller family for the last 100 years, in this period contributed to the development [of globalism] absolutely extraordinary way and gave enough focus on development issues with which all these years I was associated. Indeed, it is appropriate to say that the issue of globalization was not a single family is more influential than the Rockefellers, and the subject to which we address questions that, in a sense, still stand before us. And for that, David, we deeply grateful to you and your own contribution to advancing as you did.

David Rockefeller has been even less humble (but perhaps more honest) in his assertion about his family, and his personal role in shaping the world. In his book of memoirs, 2002, David Rockefeller wrote:

More than a century ideological extremists at both ends of the political spectrum found fault with such widely publicized incidents as the meeting with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the extraordinary influence they claim we have on the American political and economic institutions.

Some even believe we are part of a secret group of conspiratorswho are working against the interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists" involved in a conspiracy with other [conspiracies] throughout the world to build a more integrated political and economic structure – one world, if you want. If this accusation I plead guilty, and proud of it.

As if this recognition was not enough, at the meeting of the Bilderberg group in 1991, David Rockefeller, according to witnesses said:

We are grateful to the Washington Post, New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications, whose editor attended our meetings and respected their promises not to disclose for nearly 40 years.

It would be almost impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we acted in the light of publicity during these years. But this world [today] are more sophisticated and prepared to March towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is certainly preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.

So happy 96 birthday, Mr. David Rockefeller! But I'm sorry to say or maybe not so sorry) that since mainstream media "respected their promises of confidentiality", the new media, alternative media – no.

As you said yourself: "It would be almost impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we acted in the light of publicity during those years, it seems that the "light of publicity" has now gone to your "plans for peace", making their implementation much more problematic. In fact, "the world has become more sophisticated", but not because the world has become "ready" to your plans, but because the world is getting ready to reject it.

In that time, have national sovereignty certainly has problems and it is far from what I would call "ideal", the notorious "supranational scenario of the world, ruled by the representatives of the "intellectual elite and world bankers" is probably the worst scenario of all those imaginable.

So as a gift for birthday you, Mr. Rockefeller, I promise (and I'm sure I speak for a huge number of people, not just myself) that I will continue to expose your "plans for peace", so that your dreams and our nightmares, will never become a reality. The light will Shine and there will come a time when people will be ready for him to follow.

Source: translation at full or partial citation of this text a hyperlink to
Andrew Gavin Marshall is a research partner of the center for the study of Globalisation Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is also the co-editor with Michel Chossudovsky (Michel Chossudovsky) recent book, "the Global Economic Crisis: the Great depression of the XXI century" (The Global Economic Crisis: The Great Depression of the XXI Century) to theguide can be ordered through the website

He is currently working on his next book on "Global government"


Andrew Gavin Marshall Global Research



RELATED MATERIALS: Politics and Geopolitics
Возрастное ограничение