Center for Strategic Assessment and forecasts

Autonomous non-profit organization

Home / Politics and Geopolitics / Great Arab Revolution / Articles
"When it's cold in your house"
Material posted: Publication date: 05-09-2013

Former Secretary of state and one of the most famous political strategists of the United States Henry Kissinger until recently, despite its venerable age (in may 2013 he was 90 years old), headed the list of 100 leading intellectuals of the world.

Some time ago Henry Kissinger shared his vision of the situation and in the world, including in the middle East. The conversation was so openly and defiantly that at some stage the alarmed political guru assistants broke down and harshly asked the reporter to leave the premises.
"The United States is luring China and Russia, and the final nail in the coffin will be Iran, which, of course, is the main goal of Israel. We have allowed China to build up military strength and Russia to recover from Sovietization, to give them a false sense of daring, and in General this will accelerate their collapse. We are like the sniper which are lining beginner to choose a weapon, and when he's just trying to do something is obtained Bang-Bang. The coming war will be so severe that win can only be a superpower, and it's us, guys. This is why the EU is in such a rush to transform itself into a full-fledged superpower, because they know what is coming, and to survive, Europe will have become a single United nation..."

"We told the military that we would have to take over seven middle Eastern countries and take their resources, and they have almost completed that task. Everyone knows what I think about the military, but, have to say, this time they were obeying orders with excessive zeal. Only the latest step, Iran will change the balance. How long can China and Russia stand by and watch as America is conducting a sweep? We will mastermason and the Russian bear and Chinese sickle and hammer, and so then it will have to come in Israel. He will have to fight with all their might, to destroy as many Arabs. If all goes well, half the Middle East will be Israeli..."

"Over the past decade our young people we are well trained on computer games-fighters. It was interesting to look at the new game "Call of Duty Modern Warfare-3" ("Call of duty: modern warfare 3"). It completely reflects what will happen in the near future. Our young people are ready because they have been programmed to be good soldiers. And when they're told to go and fight with crazy chinks and Russians, they will obey the orders..."

"We'll build a new world order; there will remain only one superpower, and it will be a world government. Don't forget, the United States, we have these things, which have no state, and we will show the world with this weapon, when the time comes..."

It was at this point the interview was interrupted unexpectedly. Assistants Kissinger hastened to escort the journalist out the door.


"He comes from a real situation..."

Senile? Don't tell me. This sudden burst of frankness Kissinger in late 2011, a few months later in Moscow, on March 4, 2012 he met with Vladimir Putin. The conversation lasted for several hours. But what she said just now about Kissinger Yevgeny Primakov: "I (Kissinger) I think a prominent politician. Maybe these were just a few, especially in the twentieth century...First of all, I think he comes from a real situation". So what about the senility to forget.
However, some experts, believing that Kissinger, in principle, could not speak so frankly, talking about falsified this text. But, firstly, neither the former Secretary nor his entourage never denied the existence of such recorded interview. Secondly, below I will show that actually there is nothing particularly sensational Kissinger didn't.

It's no secret that the American elite is preparing for a major global war. The highest establishment of the US unified on the need for such a war, where a crucial role to play precision weapons of the sixth technological structure.

Questions and controversy about when to start such a war. One part of the American elite — the military-intelligence community — comes from the fact that the United States needs 5-7 years to best prepare for this final conflict. Others, which expresses the views of Henry Kissinger, argue that America is such a war ready: economically and ideologically, and technologically.

These contradictions manifest themselves on a personal level. Chief strategist of the interests of the military-intelligence community continues to be Zbigniew Brzezinski, who is also 85 years old. Both Brzezinski and Kissinger, to put it mildly, is not sympathetic to each other.

In this interview Kissinger with great sympathy said about Israel and about its inevitable war with Iran. But a few months earlier the CG.Brzezinski in an interview with The Daily Beast said that Israel is trying to drag the U.S. into war with Iran. He further stated that "if Israeli bombers going to targets in Iran, then perhaps our (i.e. American) fighters in Iraq would have to rise into the air to intercept".

In August 2013, the same Brzezinski opposes military operation in Syria. Thus, together with Martin Dempsey, the Chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, who in a letter to Congressman Eliot Angelo August 24, wrote that the Obama administration opposes even limited military intervention in Syria.

Kissinger says about the self-evident Alliance of Russia and China, opposing the us global ambitions. Meanwhile, over the last ten to fifteen years, Kissinger himself has spent a lot of effort that such an Alliance never took place. In contacts with Putin, he spoke about growing Chinese power, "which sometimes enters into a stupor even the Pentagon." Talking with the Chinese comrades, Kissinger subtly hinted at the unreliability of the Russians.

In the fall of 2011 GDP, announced that it will again run for President of Russia. And the first visit after that, he made it to China. During this trip, despite the existing Russian-Chinese contradictions, in fact, laid the Foundation for a real military-political understanding between Moscow and Beijing.

Seven targets

Kissinger mentions seven States in the middle East, where resources have to control the U.S. on the eve of global war. Apparently, this Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran.
Back in the 80-ies one of the implementations of this strategy plan, developed by Oded Yangon, is one of the leading analysts of military intelligence of Israel. Its essence was that, shattering the neighbors of Israel, to turn them into mini-States that are directly or indirectly controlled by the Zionist state. This program is gradually being implemented: Lebanon, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Syria or already broke up or are on the verge of collapse.

Wesley Clark, former commander of the armed forces of NATO in Europe, mentioned the Clean Break report, which was prepared in 2000, one of the prominent neoronova and future Deputy Minister of defense Richard Perle. The paper aimed at dismantling the seven countries: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.
Kissinger's remark about the "seven States" may shed light on the strange circumstances "Libyan war".

In mid-February 2011, defense Secretary Robert gates, who had to leave in a few months to resign, speaking to the Senate foreign Affairs Committee, said literally the following: "If any new Secretary of defense will be ordered to send American troops in a Muslim country, it should be promptly sent for a psychiatric examination." And suddenly, just two weeks later, Washington gave the go-ahead for direct military intervention in Libya. And this despite the fact that Gaddafi, after 11 September 2001, de facto became an ally of Western countries, and the Libyan intelligence agencies worked closely with the special services of the USA, great Britain and France.

Why, then, it was a brutal way to kill Muammar Gaddafi? Kissinger responds quite transparent: there is a long-term strategic program, and regardless of the words of the gates or the conduct of Gaddafi, it should be done.


The figures already placed

The Western media just a few hours made the main news of the world allegedly in the suburbs of Damascus, ghouta, government forces on August 21, 2013 sarin gas was used against civilians, resulting in the injury of several thousand and killed several hundred people.

Exactly one year before this, on August 21, 2012, Barack Obama publicly stated that the use by Damascus of chemical weapons would be a "red line" beyond which Washington reserves the right to use armed force against the official authorities in Syria.

Such a precise coincidence of dates has become a kind of "last warning"...but to whom?

...The most active in recent months used the thesis of the "Assad uses chemical weapons against its population" Saudi Arabia and Israel. The ruling circles of the Zionist state and the Saudi Kingdom have strong ties with the part of the American elite, which is grouped around the Republican party. Netanyahu openly supported the presidential election last year, MITT Romney. The relationship between Riyadh and the Democratic party of the United States for the last forty years, resembled a state of either cold world or cold war. Oh, and don't forget: it is the Zionist and Saudi lobbies are the most influential external players in the informal corridors of power in Washington.

In early April, Saudi king Abdullah sent a written message to Barack Obama: if Syria and Iran will emerge from the current confrontation unharmed, the political credibility to Washington in the middle East will be undermined. This message became a kind of ultimatum to the Obama administration, and not even the ultimatum to Riyadh. Without the hidden, powerful support in the highest the American establishment, the Saudis never would dare such sacrilege.

Somewhere in February-March this year finally formed a very large political coalition, which has consolidated the most diverse forces. Among them well-known Republicans, like Senator McCain, most of the leadership of the Pro-Israel lobby, the leaders of the Protestant Zionists, influential neocons, and other political groups who were hanging out around the former Bush administration, the representatives of the American circles which for various reasons maintained close intimate financial relations with Saudi Arabia and other rich Gulf countries, plus some forces of the American military-industrial complex. Only United, this coalition could challenge the core of the American elite — the military-intelligence community (BPC).

It is BPC nominated in 2008 to the American presidency of Barack Obama, who, however, managed over the past two years to make a few big mistakes in their dealings with this community.
So, say "who?" was formed as follows. On one side VRS. Its leaders originate, firstly, from the fact that required extreme caution on BBC, because even one unexpected move could drag the United States into uncontrollable, catastrophic power escalation. Secondly, they believe that long-term security interests of the USA is the most threatened increasingly powerful China.

On the other hand, temporarily United (in particular network structure) the rest of the American establishment. The most dangerous turn in the situation for the coalition is the beginning of a direct and successful negotiating process between the U.S. on one side and Iran, Russia and China, on the other, the formation of a new balance of power in the region.

Therefore, in the current Syrian crisis, this coalition has three main goals: prevent a political settlement on Syria; not to give the opportunity to begin negotiations between Tehran and Washington; best to discredit Obama and his administration.

Manual BPC for several years advocated a new round of political dialogue with Iran, based on the fact that a new regional security system in the GME without Iran's participation it is impossible to build. After the election of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani this interaction became more than likely. It is clear that in this case the significance of Israel and Saudi Arabia to the US would decrease.

The most sophisticated form of political traps — when the leader gets in a carefully constructed situation of "zugzwang". In this case, any decision only worsens his position. If Obama still push for a military solution in Syria, the trap will close — will start a military escalation that will immediately cease to depend on Washington.

Medieval samurai were taught: "war always prepare for the worst case!" Now, in this situation, the worst scenario could look like this. Americans are starting to "limited military action" against Syria. In response to a military attack on its ally Tehran blocks the Straits of Hormuz — oil price soar to $ 200 per barrel. The Western economy is starting to come apart. At the same time followed by massive missile attack on American military bases and military positions on the territory of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Turkey and UAE. Rockets rain down on Israel from Lebanon. In response, Washington and Israel start bombing Iranian territory, until the use of special weapons. Tehran announces the availability of several nuclear charges and on forcing a military nuclear program. Russia and China jointly called for an end to "military aggression". Washington rejected the claim and threatened preventive military action all who disagree with his politics. Global war is imminent.

On the other hand, if Obama will abandon a military solution in Syria, against him will begin direct psychological warfare — with accusations of political weakness, criminal concessions to enemies, friends in the middle East, etc., etc., there will be demands of impeachment of Obama, at first seemingly random, and then they will become more and more intense.

Bandar Bush

Large strategic projects almost always carry a personal personal framing. Motor this strategic project became Prince Bandar bin Sultan al-Saud, who heads the Council of national security and the intelligence service of Saudi Arabia. But, of course, without some American VIPs such a task he alone could not pull.

Prince Bandar for more than twenty years was the Saudi Ambassador to the United States. Due to the unlimited financial resources and personal charm, he became an insider in the most influential American clans, especially close to the Republican party. Was nicknamed Bandar Bush for his special closeness to the Bush family. Former American President George Bush senior at the time, publicly called Prince Bandar "his son".

Saudi intelligence services since the beginning of 2013 one of the main directions of their subversive activities has made the accusation of the regime of Bashar al-Assad to use chemical weapons. When this happened, and large punctures. For example, in the month of February this year in the Turkish province of Hatay was detained a group of "rebels", curated structures Bandar, who was smuggled into Syria a large shipment of sarin.

In June and July began the first phase of the operation was deposed Egyptian President Morsi. So the Saudis attacked "Muslim brotherhood" — its main in the region's political and ideological opponents. Israel immediately picked up the baton, starting all over the world a powerful lobbying campaign in support of the Egyptian military junta. At the same time began the mass unrest in Turkey is a tough warning and Erdogan and high-ranking politicians in the US that support it. Ahead of schedule resigned of the Qatari Emir, who "vehemently disliked the Saudis and was used in this loveless love." After loosening Ivanov, Turks and Qataris are the main trump cards in the Syrian conflict were in the hands of Prince Bandar.

In the same period, Prince Bandar bin Sultan takes in Riyadh a group of influential (and tame) American senators, where in the closed form discussed the situation in Syria and the situation around Iran. To his rendezvous arrives Robert John Sawyers, Director of the British MI-6. Bandar actively meets with leaders of the Pro-American pool of Arab States in the middle East.

In July, the head of Saudi intelligence toured a number of European countries, and at the end of this month arrives in Moscow to meet with GDP. Moreover, the visit to Moscow was painted in a very confidential tone.
Bandar bin Sultan to Russian President promises to buy $ 15 billion of Russian weapons, to conclude a secret agreement on joint management of the world oil market, to eliminate competition to Russian gas in Europe, to save the Sochi Olympics from terrorists. Remember the immortal words of a classic: "And here Ostap suffered!"? He was referring to Ostap Bender.

In response, Saudi Bandar asked Putin one Russia needs to stop supporting Syria. At some point, the Prince even began to threaten, or to frighten: if Russia refuses the Saudi proposal, "the military option is unavoidable".

In other words, Moscow roughly wanted to buy for 30 pieces of silver. Of course, Bandar got very hard, on the verge of a foul, the rebuke of the Russian leader.

But something strange: Bandar bin Sultan after the meeting was not upset and was in good spirits.

If Saudi king Abdullah wanted something to negotiate with Vladimir Putin, why in Moscow flew exactly Bandar? Why, for example, the king sent his son, the head of the National guard, much more moderate Prince Mutaib?

But here precisely lies the Eastern cunning. Bandar knew that the relationship between Putin and Obama not only does not add up, but even deteriorated. And all this talk July 31, in such brazen form was to demonstrate GDP that Bandar said on behalf of the American official circles. Moreover, the Saudi it and not hide it. Bandar said to Putin that any agreement reached will be supported by Washington. That is one of the special tasks of a Saudi Prince was to attempt to further strain relations between the leaders of the United States and the Russian Federation.

The next phase of the operation almost failed

Thus, strategic provocation began on August 21. However vague video images of the consequences of the use of chemical weapons in ghouta, wrote the English newspaper "daily mail", find it difficult or impossible to verify. But then again the time appeared on the scene the Israelites. It turned out that the military intelligence unit 8200 have provided information "about the chemical attack of the Assad regime against the civilian population". What were these "facts", still nobody knows. But the representative of military intelligence Aviv Israel Kochavi specially traveled throughout Europe and the U.S. to share "valuable information".

Immediately it should be noted that Bashar al-Assad could not use chemical weapons against its population, at least for five reasons.

Firstly, it is, sooner or later, could have a significant impact on reducing the social support base of the regime. Secondly, Syria established its chemical weapons stockpile (with the support of the Soviet Union) as a counterbalance to Israel's nuclear potential. The use of these weapons in the civil war significantly devalues the strategic deterrent effect. Thirdly, over the past few months the Syrian army has made significant changes in their favor the situation on various fronts without any chemical weapons. Fourthly, the use of Damascus chemical weapons against its own population would inevitably lead to the deterioration of relations with Moscow and Beijing. After all, both Russia and China have obligations as a great power for global security, including for the implementation of the 1992 Convention on the prohibition of the use of chemical weapons. Finally, fifth, it is unlikely that the Assad regime would dare to such obvious nonsense before the agreed upon arrival of the UN inspectors into the country.

Despite the fact that 61% of Americans opposed military action in Syria, in the Eastern Mediterranean began the concentration of U.S. military forces. In Amman on August 25, we hosted a meeting of chiefs of General staff of ten countries, whose armed forces are at that time expressed a desire to participate in the intervention against Syria.

Peak tension fell on the night of 29 to 30 August, when the world was spread information that the missile attack against the US on Syria will start at this time. But then, despite the continuing severe verbal threats by the US, the situation gradually began to be discharged. Against the military operations made by the 12 countries of NATO. The house of Commons voted against British participation in the war against Syria. In Germany, the question of a military operation was not even submitted for parliamentary hearings. Against a military adventure was made by the EU.

The leadership of the current U.S. administration began to realize that the so-called "chemical attack" is actually a carefully orchestrated provocation, including against the current occupant of the White house. To buy time, the White house went to Congress (which will meet only September 9), to obtain legal permission to conduct military action against Damascus. With the same factor — the delay time due to the fact that the UN experts who returned from Damascus, for at least two weeks will prepare the final report for the SAT.

The emerging détente of the situation around Syria is associated with the fact that from the very beginning Moscow and Beijing has taken a tough stance in the UN Security Council. At the same time V. Putin, as commander-in-chief, gave the order on strengthening of the Russian naval group in the Eastern Mediterranean. And being in the Russian far East, he said that the provocation caused the aggravation of the situation in Syria.
At the same time, special representatives of the Obama team through confidential channels trying to figure out and to predict the reaction of Iran on a possible "limited U.S. strike on Syria". For example, quite unexpectedly, the Sultan of Oman Qaboos bin said visited Tehran, where he met with the spiritual leader of Iran Ali Khamenei. Rahbar strictly warned Americans that the military action against Syria, almost immediately will lead to serious regional destabilization.

In the short term here, in the middle East, the most possible realization of one of two scenarios.
The first option is in some degree a repetition of the so-called "Hormuz crisis" of December 2011. There were also numerous threats, political hysteria on the verge of paranoia, the movement of fleets, etc. But the attack on Iran never took place, war was avoided.

The second, less optimistic scenario is that in the next 7-10 days it might be much more large-scale provocation for the purpose of forced involvement of the United States in a military conflict in the middle East. Moreover, such provocation can occur not only in Syria, but also, for example, on the Turkish-Syrian border, or sent to any American base (e.g. in the UAE).

In any event, as slip Kissinger, in a strategic scenario, namely Syria and Iran remain the main targets for those who seek to accelerate the approximation of the global war.

When it's cold in your house,
When your vineyards skinny,
Know that is sweeter than the whisper of love,
The soft rustle of pistachio groves.


Shamil Sultanov


RELATED MATERIALS: Politics and Geopolitics
Возрастное ограничение