23 December, on the day of the arrival in Damascus of the first group of observers of the Arab League in the Syrian capital rocked by two powerful explosions. Terrorists suicide bombers car bombs in the buildings of the Syrian security services. Dozens of victims, hundreds of wounded. That, and most importantly – who is behind these attacks? Let's try to state our version. Syria has become one of the countries that experienced a wave of revolutions, has already received in some sources the proper name – the "Arab spring". This series of unrest swept through the Arab world.
The result was not only an offset of a number of governments, but also changing the geopolitical map of the region: many States have lost their power, some have purchased it.
What all of these riots have very little revolutionary was well demonstrated by recent events in Egypt, where in these days occurs the third "revolution" in Libya – which had been wiped out several towns and killed tens of thousands of Libyans, and all because of the desire to destroy a single person.
Will offer a discussion of their own vision, formed as a result of collating and analyzing available information.
I believe that with the end of 2010 the world elite started the practical phase of the plan for the remaking of the world order prevailing at the end of the Second world war. In fact, the plan was a true anti-crisis plan not only preserve, but also strengthen American domination. And this plan was implemented simultaneously in at least three areas: in the economy (actions on the deepening crisis in Europe and the actual collapse of the EU), military-political (action for enhanced control over key areas of hydrocarbon production - initialization processes of the "Arab spring", the aggression against Libya, etc.), information (operation cover – WikiLeaks, "occupy America", etc.). Moreover, everything we saw, countless G20 summits and other gatherings – it's all a bluff, the dust in the eyes. Real politics, as so often in history, was done in a different place.
Why, starting the process of redrawing the Arab world, such "undivided" attention was paid to Libya? Why is NATO so quickly turned the operation after the execution of Gaddafi, not bothering even to establish more or less acceptable control over orphan sea of weapons from the former Libyan army and, above all, above the hundreds of MANPADS? Most likely, it's very simple - Gaddafi knew too much about European and middle East policy, he could act as the initiator of Association of a number of African Nations in the event of unleashing a major campaign in the region.
And plans to unleash a regional conflict became a reality after the political situation in Iran was not out of control of the current leadership as a result provoked opposition. Moreover, one of the significant results of these demonstrations was the failure sufficiently wide intelligence network of the CIA and other Western intelligence agencies in the Islamic Republic. It became clear that to undermine the situation inside is difficult, and requires a large external shock. In the military sector, the stated withdrawal of American troops from Iraq becomes their redeployment in a number of neighbouring States of Iran. In the Mediterranean sea napravite striking force of the U.S. Navy. Go to the area and the ships of the Russian Navy, and the head of the Russian General staff on meet the press did not exclude the possibility of large-scale conflict in the middle East in the near future.
However, in addition to Gaddafi, which might "excite" a number of African leaders and to sow confusion in the event of aggression against Iran, Tehran has only had one reliable ally in the region – Syria.
The operation of the Israeli army against the Lebanese Hezbollah in 2006 showed that this force, supported by Damascus, a powerful and effective weapon. To prevent the preservation of its war-fighting capabilities was unacceptable luxury in the event of an attack on Iran. To reduce the effectiveness of this organization it was possible, if you deprive it of support, primarily from Damascus.
In addition, Syria has a fairly impressive armed forces that in case of unleashing an aggressive campaign in the region, certainly would be made on the side of Iran.
It is for this reason Syria has become the focus of activity in the middle East. From which direction will go the development of the situation in this country, whether the Bashar al-Assad to retain power, depends on what, break out whether a larger-scale conflict, which will be due to the aggression against Iran.
The analysis shows that tensions in diplomatic work situation in Syria today is almost no way inferior to the work of the diplomats on the eve of the Second world war. Here are just a few strokes of this work.
The aggravation of the situation around Syria is becoming apparent in October this year. In the press putting all the new "evidence" large-scale "atrocities" of government troops. Next is the inclusion in the UN Security Council draft resolution on Syria, in which in a rigid form is required to yield to the demands of the "rebels". Russia and China reject this resolution. But diplomats understand that for a long time the practice of unilateral actions in case of failure in the UN security Council. That is why Russia is making its own compromise resolution on Syria, which meets with the disapproval of leading Western diplomats. However, the position prescribed in the Russian document that allows you to at least begin the search for compromises.
In parallel, Iran is seeking opportunities to reduce tensions in the region. Primarily he seeks to find a compromise with Saudi Arabia. It is possible that it something can. But then the press thrown in a "duck" about the involvement of the citizen of Iran to the assassination of Ambassador Riyadh to Washington and the process is again stalled. But Tehran is trying to avoid backsliding - security Minister Haidar Maslahi Iran in an official visit to Saudi Arabia. Stated that Moslehi met with crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Nayef bin Abdul Aziz, with whom he discussed a number of issues of mutual interest, in particular, developments in Bahrain and Syria and a question about the assassination of a citizen of Iran's Ambassador in Riyadh to Washington. The very fact of the talks allows us to speak about may be incomplete, but the success of the Iranian side.
In parallel, the Damascus agrees to the terms put forward by the Arab League – observers of the organization will be allowed into the country.
The tension is enormous, at stake is the future of several countries in the region, and possibly the whole world. And at this critical moment, when only just dawned dawn of a possible resolution of the Syrian problem and normalize the situation in this country, day 23 of December there had been two large-scale terrorist act. The conclusion is only one – exist and are active forces that are extremely interested in normalizing the situation in Syria, as it distances the possibility of a strike on Iran. What is this power? Guess we'll know soon...
- 04-07-2012Russia cooking oil blockade and the collapse of the scenario of the 80-ies
- 23-12-2012The Vedic understanding of state policy
- 22-11-2013In the archives of the "world government"
- 08-01-2014Of a mega-Church and their communication strategies
- 08-11-2012The main threat to peace or a recipe for success